Testing a web app by hand doesn’t scale — and test code needs an owner
Most teams either click through key flows before each release or maintain a suite of browser tests in code. Both get harder with every release.
- Manual passes take hours and still skip the flows nobody remembered.
- Script-based browser tests break when a button moves, and someone has to fix them.
- Bugs in sign-up, checkout or account settings reach users before the team notices.
Automated website testing you describe instead of code
Write the steps
Write the steps and the expected result in plain language. BuniOD matches each step to your web app and adds the checks.
Automated UI testing in a real browser
Scenarios run in a real Chromium browser and use the interface your users see — pages, forms and buttons.
Fewer broken tests
When an element moves, stored locators, element fingerprints and AI matching find it before a step fails.
Every run on record
Each run keeps step and check results, screenshots, and console and network logs.
Web application testing tools: script-based vs BuniOD
A general comparison. Script-based tools include frameworks such as Playwright, Selenium and Cypress.
| Script-based tools | BuniOD | |
|---|---|---|
| How a test is created | Written in code, or recorded into code | A plain-language prompt becomes a scenario you confirm |
| Who can add a test | People who write and read test code | QA, product managers and anyone who can write down the steps |
| When the UI changes | Selectors break and are fixed in code | Moved elements are re-matched where supported |
| Browsers | Several browsers, depending on the tool | Desktop Chromium |
| Scheduling and CI | Run from your CI pipeline | Daily schedule built in, or on demand; CI integrations coming soon |
| Cost | Open-source frameworks; you maintain the code and infrastructure | Free plan with 500K tokens a month; paid plans from $39/mo |
Choose a script-based tool if
- engineers on your team write and maintain test code
- you need Firefox, Safari (WebKit) or mobile browser coverage
- every pull request must pass browser tests in CI
Choose BuniOD if
- testers, product managers or founders should be able to add a check
- you’d rather not maintain a test codebase
- you want your web app’s key flows checked every day, starting today
From written steps to a runnable test
Prompt: the steps you write
// Log in first 1. Click on "Sign in" 2. Fill in the email and password from "Test Customer" and click on "Continue" 3. Wait for 2 seconds // Update the profile 4. Click on "Account", then on "Profile" 5. Set the value of the "Phone" field to "+998 90 123 45 67" 6. Click on "Save changes" and wait for 2 seconds 7. Confirm you see the text "Changes saved" 8. Click on "Account", then on "Profile" again
Expected result
The “Phone” field shows “+998 90 123 45 67”.
Steps matched on the page
- Click “Sign in” in the header
- Type the test identity’s email and password and click “Continue”
- Open “Account” → “Profile”
- Replace the “Phone” value and click “Save changes”
- Open “Account” → “Profile” again
Checks
- “Changes saved” is visible (step 7)
- After reopening the profile, “Phone” shows the new number
Demo data: Acme Shop — Staging. Your scenario follows your own pages.
Three steps to a daily check
Connect your site
Add your staging URL. Public pages need nothing else; signed-in areas use HTTP basic auth or a test identity.
Write the steps
Write the test steps and the expected result in plain language, the way you would brief a tester. BuniOD matches each step to your page and adds the checks.
Review, then run daily
Confirm the scenario, run it on demand or once a day, and see the failed step with a screenshot and logs.
Free plan with 500K tokens a month · Pro $39/mo · Scale $59/mo · unlimited projects and scenarios on every plan.
See pricingQuestions
What is a web application testing tool?
Software that checks your web app works the way users expect — by opening pages, filling in forms, clicking through flows and verifying the results. BuniOD does this from a plain-language description, in a real browser, without test code.
How is BuniOD different from other UI testing tools?
It tests your web app through its user interface in a real browser and covers automated UI testing of whole user flows, described in plain language instead of code. It is not a cross-browser testing grid: runs use desktop Chromium.
How do I choose automated testing tools for web applications?
Start with who will write and maintain the tests, which browsers you must cover and how often the checks need to run. Code frameworks suit engineers who need cross-browser or per-commit runs; BuniOD suits testers and product teams who want key flows checked daily in desktop Chromium without a test codebase.
Does it test Safari, Firefox or mobile browsers?
Not today. Runs use desktop Chromium. If you need cross-browser or device coverage, use BuniOD alongside a browser grid. Native mobile app testing is coming soon.
Can it test pages behind a login?
Yes. Public pages need only the URL. For signed-in areas, use HTTP basic auth (stored encrypted) or a test identity with its own inbox.
How often do the tests run?
On demand whenever you need them, or once a day at a time you choose.