Describe flows instead of coding them.
Write the test case steps and the expected result in plain language — that is how you convert a manual test case to automation. BuniOD matches each step to your pages and adds the checks.
BuniOD doesn’t replace testers — it automates the manual test cases you re-click every release. Write each one as plain-language steps, review the generated test and let it run every day.
Write the test case steps and the expected result in plain language — that is how you convert a manual test case to automation. BuniOD matches each step to your pages and adds the checks.
Every generated scenario waits for your confirmation. Adjust input values or regenerate from an updated prompt.
When an element moves, BuniOD tries stored locators, element fingerprints and AI matching before a step fails — reducing repair work after interface changes.
Each failed run shows the step or check that failed, an explanation, a screenshot and console and network logs.
No new framework to adopt: an automation tool for manual testing that sits beside your team and takes over writing and replaying scenarios.
Add your staging URL. Use HTTP basic auth for protected environments and test identities for signed-in flows.
Turn the regression checklist you run by hand or keep in manual testing tools into precise plain-language steps, one flow at a time.
Read each generated scenario, adjust values or regenerate, and confirm the ones you want to keep.
Organize scenarios into business processes and let them run daily, or start a run whenever you need one.
Open a failed run to see the failed step, the explanation, the screenshot and the logs — then decide whether it is a bug or a scenario to update.
Automating a manual test case with BuniOD is mostly a writing job, and your test case already holds most of it: a list of steps. BuniOD needs those steps written precisely — the labels as they appear on the page, the values to type, where to wait and what to check — plus the result that proves the case passed. Below is the whole path for one case, from a spreadsheet row to a scenario that BuniOD, a test automation platform for web apps, runs every day. Our guide on how to automate manual test cases covers the same method in more depth, for any tool.
Start with stable, high-impact cases that you re-run every release and that have a clear pass or fail: sign-up, sign-in, password reset, the main paid flow. Leave cases that need visual or usability judgement, one-off checks and features that still change every sprint for later — or keep them manual.
A manual case is usually a numbered list of clicks with a vague expected outcome such as “password changed successfully”. Keep the list — it becomes your prompt — but make every step unambiguous: name buttons and fields exactly as they appear on the page, give the value to type, and say what to confirm before moving on. “Log in” becomes three steps: fill in the email, fill in the password, click “Sign in”.
Group the steps into short sections such as log in, do the action and check the result. Use a test identity for emails and passwords, attach any file the flow uploads, and add a wait after anything slow, such as an email or a payment. The expected result is one or two things you can observe at the end: a URL, a heading, a message, an email in the inbox. A precise expected result is what turns a demo into a test. Our guide to writing prompts for test generation has full examples.
BuniOD works through your steps in a browser on your staging environment, matches each one to a real element on the page and records the checks. Read the result and ask two questions: could this pass while the feature is broken, and could it fail while the feature works? If a step was matched to the wrong element, word it more precisely and regenerate; if a value is wrong, adjust the input value. Nothing runs until a person confirms the scenario.
Signed-in flows use HTTP basic auth or a test identity. A test identity has its own inbox, so the scenario can open and check the emails your application sends. Group scenarios that depend on each other into a business process — sign-up before password reset, for example — so a dependent scenario is skipped when an earlier one fails.
Automation takes over re-clicking the cases that pass every release; it does not replace testing. Exploratory sessions, usability and visual judgement, and deciding what matters in a new feature stay with people, and they get more of your time once the repetition is gone. AI for manual testers looks at how the role changes, and manual QA vs AI testing compares where each one is stronger.
A password-reset case from a regression spreadsheet: the same steps, made exact, and the scenario BuniOD built from them.
Manual test case · TC-114 Password reset
Expected: Password is changed successfully.
Prompt: the same steps, made exact
// Request a reset 1. Click on "Sign in", then on "Forgot password?" 2. Fill in the "Email" field with the email from "Test Customer" 3. Click on "Send reset link" 4. Wait for 10 seconds // Set a new password 5. Open the newest email in the inbox of "Test Customer" and click on "Reset password" 6. Fill in "New password" and "Repeat password" with "Reset!2026" 7. Click on "Save" and wait for 2 seconds // Sign in with it 8. Fill in the email from "Test Customer" and the password "Reset!2026" 9. Click on "Sign in" and wait for 2 seconds
Expected result
The dashboard opens and its header shows the name of “Test Customer”.
Illustrative example on a demo store (Acme Shop — Staging). BuniOD matches the steps to your own pages.
AI for manual testing: the repetitive parts of the job, handled consistently.
Scenarios read as steps anyone on the team can follow.
Nothing runs until a person on your team confirms it.
Moved elements are re-located where supported, and new locations are saved after a passing run.
Run related scenarios in order and skip dependent ones when an earlier scenario fails.
Verify signup, password-reset and notification emails with dedicated test inboxes.
Mark scenarios as critical, high, medium or low and filter by them.
Write each manual test case as precise plain-language steps — exact button and field labels, the values to type, waits and checks — plus an observable expected result. An AI tool such as BuniOD matches those steps to your pages and turns them into a browser scenario with checks; a tester reviews it, adjusts values or regenerates it, and confirms it. Confirmed scenarios then run on demand or on a daily schedule, and each failure comes with a screenshot and logs.
No. They take over the repetitive part — re-clicking the same test cases every release. Exploratory testing, deciding what to test and judging whether a result makes sense stay with people, and in BuniOD a person confirms every generated scenario before it runs.
Three things: the people who know the test cases can write them without code, a person reviews each generated test before it runs, and every failure comes with evidence — the failed step, a screenshot and logs. BuniOD is built around those three.
Many tools start from test code or a recorded session. BuniOD starts from a plain-language prompt — your test steps and the expected result — and builds a complete scenario with checks for your team to review. Confirmed scenarios run in a real browser on demand or once a day.
Not yet. There is no import, but you can paste the steps of a case into the prompt and make each one exact — labels, values, waits and checks — which is the rewrite you would do anyway to automate it well. Start with the handful of cases that would stop a release, and add more once those run reliably.
No. Scenarios are created from plain language and read as steps, so the people who know the test cases can write and review them. What stays essential is testing skill: choosing what to check and stating what proves it worked. Our guide on test scenarios vs test cases explains the shift from clicks to intent.
Runs use desktop Chromium, so Firefox, Safari, mobile browsers and native mobile apps are not covered. There is no CI/CD trigger, public API or Jira integration yet — runs start on demand or on the daily schedule. BuniOD checks web UI flows end to end; it is not built for unit, API or load testing.
Create a free account, add your application and describe the first flow you want to verify.
Start free