Test automation platform

The AI test automation platform for web applications

Write the steps, review the scenario, run it in a browser. BuniOD matches each step to your pages, adds the checks and runs the scenarios you confirm — on demand or once a day.

app.acme.com Sample data
Sign up → onboardingpassed
Checkout → payment → taxpassed
Subscription upgraderunning
Password resetqueued
38/40passed in the last run
The basics

What is a test automation platform?

A test automation platform is a product that handles the whole life of an automated test in one place: creating it, running it, reporting what happened and keeping it working as the application changes. A test framework gives you a library for writing tests in code; a platform adds everything around the code — where and when tests run, where the results go and who can read them.

Platforms differ most in how tests are created. Some wrap code you still write yourself, some record clicks, and AI test automation platforms turn plain-language instructions into tests. Our explainer on AI test automation covers how that generation works and where it falls short.

BuniOD is a test automation platform for web applications in that last group. You write the test steps and the expected result in plain language, BuniOD matches each step to your pages and builds a scenario with checks, a person on your team reviews and confirms it, and the confirmed scenario runs in a real browser on demand or once a day.

How BuniOD works

From one description to a recorded run

Seven steps from a plain-language description to automated website testing. You write the description and confirm the scenario — BuniOD handles the rest.

01

Connect

Add your application’s URL. Public pages need nothing else; signed-in flows need a dedicated test account.

02

Write the steps

Write the test steps and the result you expect in plain language.

03

Generate

BuniOD works through your application in a browser and records the steps, the test data and the checks.

04

Review

Read the steps, adjust input values, or regenerate from an updated prompt. Nothing runs until you confirm it.

05

Run

Run confirmed scenarios manually or on a daily schedule, in the order you define.

06

Inspect

Each run keeps step results, screenshots, console and network logs, and an explanation of any failure.

07

Follow up

Get email and in-app notifications, and answer agent questions when BuniOD cannot tell what to do.

Platform capabilities

Web application testing with AI: what BuniOD does today

QA automation tools for web applications — each capability below is available to signed-up users now.

How BuniOD works as a web application testing tool →

Prompt-to-Scenario Generation

Turns plain-language test steps and an expected result into a runnable scenario: each step matched to your page, checks added — automated test generation, no scripts.

Review and Confirm

Generated scenarios wait for your confirmation. Only confirmed scenarios are included in runs.

Refine and Regenerate

Change an input value, or update the prompt and regenerate the scenario.

Browser Execution

Automated web testing in a real Chromium browser at a desktop viewport.

Manual and Daily Runs

Run on demand or on a daily schedule — automated regression testing for key flows.

Self-Healing Element Matching

Self-healing tests: stored locators, element fingerprints and AI matching find elements that moved, and the new locations are saved after a passing run.

Run History

Every run keeps step and check results, screenshots, and console and network logs.

Failure Explanations

Shows which step or check failed and why, so you can decide whether it is a bug or a scenario to update.

Business Processes

Group scenarios into ordered processes; dependent scenarios are skipped when an earlier one fails.

Test Identities and Email Checks

Give scenarios their own test inbox and verify the emails your application sends.

Team Access

Invite teammates and choose which projects each person can see.

Built for software teams

One platform. Six ways to use it.

Each role gets something concrete from the same scenarios.

CTOs

See what was tested, not what was promised.

  • A pass/fail record for every scenario run
  • Token-based pricing instead of per-seat fees
QA Engineers

Spend less time writing scripts.

  • Write the steps instead of coding them
  • Review the scenario before it runs
Developers

See exactly where a flow broke.

  • Failed step, screenshot and logs in one place
  • Console and network logs for each run
Engineering Managers

Keep key flows under regular checks.

  • Daily scheduled runs
  • Business processes that run in order
Product Managers

Write acceptance criteria in plain language.

  • Write the steps the way you would brief a tester
  • Read results without reading code
DevOps

Check staging before you release.

  • Point projects at staging or production URLs
  • HTTP basic auth for protected environments
AI models

An agentic test automation platform, built on Gemini and GPT-5

An AI agent carries out the scenarios you describe and confirm, step by step in a real browser. Gemini models generate scenarios and GPT-5 drives runs; if a model fails, BuniOD falls back to another one automatically.

GeminiGPT-5
BuniOD
Your application

You work with scenarios; model selection is handled for you.

Dashboard preview

Scenarios, runs and questions on one screen

Illustrative values. The layout follows the BuniOD dashboard.

acme · app.acme.com Sample data
Last run
38 / 40
scenarios passed
Scenarios
24
confirmed · 2 in review
Run history
126
runs this month
Agent questions
2
waiting for your answer
Schedule
Daily · 08:00
plus manual runs
Why BuniOD

How BuniOD differs from traditional QA automation tools for web applications

Traditional automated testing tools start from code. BuniOD starts from a description of the flow.

Traditional Testing ToolsBuniOD
How it startsWrite scripts and selectorsWrite the steps in plain language
Who can review itPeople who read test codeAnyone who can read the steps
When the UI changesLocators break and need fixingMoved elements are re-matched where supported
When it runsWhen someone triggers itOn demand or on a daily schedule
When it failsA stack trace to decodeFailed step, explanation, screenshot and logs
What you maintainTest code, fixtures and helpersDescriptions and expected results
Choosing a platform

The four parts of a test automation platform

Whatever a vendor calls them, every test automation platform does four jobs. Compare products job by job: a platform that is strong at authoring but weak at maintenance costs you more later.

Authoring: how tests are created

Someone has to turn “a customer can buy a subscription” into steps and checks a machine can repeat. In a framework that means code; in a recorder, a captured session; in BuniOD, numbered plain-language steps and an expected result that become a scenario you review before it runs. Good authoring makes every step and the expected result explicit, because a test that only checks that a page loaded passes while the feature is broken. Our guide to writing prompts for test generation shows what precise steps look like.

Execution: where and when tests run

Execution covers the browser, the environment and the trigger: which browsers and viewports, against which environment, started by whom — a person, a schedule or a CI pipeline. BuniOD runs confirmed scenarios in headless desktop Chromium, manually or once a day at a time you choose, and runs the scenarios in a business process in the order you set.

Reporting: what you see when something fails

A pass/fail count is not enough. When a run fails you need the step that failed, what the page looked like and what the browser logged, so that a tester can decide quickly whether it is a bug or a test to update. Each BuniOD run keeps step and check results, screenshots, console and network logs, and a plain-language explanation of the failure.

Maintenance: what happens when the product changes

Maintenance is where most automation projects stall. Martin Fowler’s TestPyramid note calls tests that run end to end through the UI brittle, expensive to write and time-consuming to run, and our article on flaky tests covers the usual causes. BuniOD reduces locator upkeep with self-healing element matching — stored locators, then element fingerprints, then AI matching — and saves the new location after a passing run. Intended product changes still need an updated description, and that work stays with your team.

Test automation platform vs framework: Playwright, Selenium and the rest

Playwright and Selenium are frameworks: libraries you write tests with. Playwright Test is an end-to-end test framework that supports Chromium, WebKit and Firefox; Selenium implements the W3C WebDriver specification and works with all major browsers. Both are free and open source, and both assume someone on the team writes and maintains code.

A platform sits a level above. It may use a framework under the hood, but you work with tests, runs and results rather than code and infrastructure. The trade-off is control: a framework lets you do anything you can program, while a platform makes many of those decisions for you.

Framework (Playwright, Selenium)Test automation platform (BuniOD)
What you work withTest code, selectors and fixturesPlain-language steps and reviewed scenarios
Who writes testsEngineers who codeAnyone who can write down the steps and the expected result
Where tests runMachines or CI runners you set upBuniOD’s browsers, on demand or once a day
BrowsersChromium, Firefox and WebKit (Playwright); all major browsers (Selenium)Desktop Chromium only
ResultsReporters and traces you configureRun history with screenshots, logs and failure explanations
When the UI changesYou update selectors and waitsMoved elements are re-matched where supported
CI/CD and APIBuilt in — tests live in your repositoryNot available yet
CostFree libraries; you pay in engineering time and infrastructureFree plan, then a monthly subscription

If your engineers already maintain a Playwright suite that checks every merge, keep it. A platform like BuniOD can sit next to it and cover the flows nobody has time to script, or be the first layer of automation for a team without test engineers. We compare the approaches in AI testing vs Playwright and AI testing vs Selenium, and the Playwright alternative page shows when each one is the better choice.

How to choose a test automation platform

Feature lists look alike. These questions separate the platforms that fit your team from the ones that only demo well.

  • Who will write and review the tests? If only engineers will touch them, a code-first tool or a framework is fine. If testers, product managers or support staff know the flows best, choose a platform where they can describe a test and read the result.
  • Does it test what your users use? Check browsers, viewports, mobile and the kind of testing: UI flows, APIs or load. A platform that covers only desktop Chromium, as BuniOD does today, is not enough if most of your customers are on Safari on their phones.
  • Are generated tests reviewed before they count? AI-generated tests save time only if someone checks that they test the right thing. Look for a review step and steps a person can read.
  • What happens after a redesign? Ask how elements are located, what happens when a locator stops matching, and who fixes the test.
  • What evidence comes with a failure? Screenshots, logs and the failed step should be part of the run, not something you reproduce by hand.
  • How does it fit your release process? If tests must gate every pull request, you need CI/CD triggers and an API. Check this first — BuniOD does not have them yet.
  • How is it priced? Per seat, per run or by usage. Estimate your expected volume before you commit.

Then run a pilot on three to five flows that would stop a release if they broke, against your own staging environment. Our lists of the best end-to-end testing tools and the best regression testing tools compare the main options, and the comparison pages put BuniOD side by side with testRigor, mabl, Momentic and others.

Where BuniOD fits — and where it does not yet

BuniOD fits teams that ship a web application, know which flows must never break, and want those flows checked every day without writing or maintaining test code: sign-up, checkout, booking, billing, onboarding. It suits QA teams moving manual regression into automation, and product teams that want acceptance criteria checked in plain language.

It is not the right tool yet if you need cross-browser or mobile coverage, tests triggered from CI/CD, a public API, or unit, API and load testing; for those, a framework or another platform is the honest answer. The how it works page follows one run from start to finish, and the page on how QA teams automate manual testing with AI shows how they move a regression checklist into BuniOD.

Questions, answered

What is a test automation platform?

A test automation platform is a product that covers the whole life of automated tests: creating them, running them, reporting results and keeping them working as the application changes. A framework such as Playwright or Selenium is a code library for writing tests; a platform adds where and when tests run, the results and the upkeep in one place.

Is BuniOD a framework like Playwright or Selenium?

No. Playwright and Selenium are open-source libraries you write tests with in code. BuniOD is a hosted platform: you write the test steps and the expected result in plain language, review the scenario BuniOD builds from them, and BuniOD runs it in a browser and keeps the results. The two can work side by side — a framework for developer-owned tests, BuniOD for the flows nobody has time to script.

Do I need to write code to use BuniOD?

No. You write the steps and the result you expect in plain language, and BuniOD matches each step to your pages and adds the checks — no scripts, selectors or page objects. You still decide what to test and what counts as success, and a person reviews each scenario before it runs.

Which browsers and devices does BuniOD test on?

Runs use headless Chromium at a desktop viewport. Firefox, Safari, mobile browsers and native mobile apps are not covered today, so if they matter to your users, test them another way.

Can BuniOD run from our CI/CD pipeline?

Not yet. There is no CI/CD trigger, public API or third-party integration. Scenarios run when someone starts them or on a daily schedule at a time you choose, and the results stay in the run history.

How does BuniOD keep tests working when the UI changes?

When an element moves, BuniOD tries the stored locators, then element fingerprints, then AI matching before a step fails, and saves the new location after a passing run. Intended changes to a flow still need an updated description, which you review and confirm like any new scenario.

Is there a free plan?

Yes. The free plan includes 500K tokens a month; Pro is $39 a month and Scale $59 a month, with unlimited projects and scenarios on every plan. See pricing for what each plan includes.

Get started

See BuniOD on your application

Create a free account, add your application and write the steps of the first flow you want to verify.

Start free